Spectral norm of random tensors

Ryota Tomioka, Taiji Suzuki

Notation and main result

if uk∈Snk−1\boldsymbol{u}_{k}\in S_{n_{k}-1} for k=1,…,Kk=1,\ldots,K.

By the assumption E[esXi1i2⋯iKu1i1u2i2⋯uKiK]≤exp⁡(u1i12u2i22⋯uKiK2σ2s2/2)E\left[e^{sX_{i_{1}i_{2}\cdots i_{K}}u_{1i_{1}}u_{2i_{2}}\cdots u_{Ki_{K}}}\right]\leq\exp(u_{1i_{1}}^{2}u_{2i_{2}}^{2}\cdots u_{Ki_{K}}^{2}\sigma^{2}s^{2}/2). Then follow the line of the proof of Hoeffding’s inequality to obtain

Minimizing over ss, the right-hand side becomes e−t2/(2σ2)e^{-t^{2}/(2\sigma^{2})}. Similarly we obtain P(X(u1,…,uK)≤−t)≤e−t2/(2σ2)P(\mathcal{X}(\boldsymbol{u}_{1},\ldots,\boldsymbol{u}_{K})\leq-t)\leq e^{-t^{2}/(2\sigma^{2})}, and the statement is obtained by taking the union of the two cases. ∎

Assume that for each fixed uk∈Sk\boldsymbol{u}_{k}\in S_{k} (k=1,…,Kk=1,\ldots,K), we have

Then the spectral norm \bigl{|}\!\bigl{|}\!\bigl{|}\mathcal{X}\bigr{|}\!\bigr{|}\!\bigr{|} can be bounded as follows:

with probability at least 1−δ1-\delta and K0=log⁡(3/2)K_{0}=\log(3/2).

We use a covering number argument. Let C1,…,CKC_{1},\ldots,C_{K} be ϵ\epsilon-covers of Sn1−1,…,SnK−1S^{n_{1}-1},\ldots,S^{n_{K}-1}. Then since Sn1−1×⋯×SnK−1S^{n_{1}-1}\times\cdots\times S^{n_{K}-1} is compact, there is a maximizer (u1∗,…,uK∗)(\boldsymbol{u}_{1}^{\ast},\ldots,\boldsymbol{u}_{K}^{\ast}) of (1) and using the ϵ\epsilon-covers, we can write

where uˉk∈Ck\bar{\boldsymbol{u}}_{k}\in C_{k} and ∥δk∥≤ϵ\|\boldsymbol{\delta}_{k}\|\leq\epsilon for k=1,…,Kk=1,\ldots,K by the definition. Now

Take ϵ=K0/K\epsilon=K_{0}/K then the sum inside the parenthesis can be bounded as follows:

Since the ϵ\epsilon-covering number ∣Ck∣|C_{k}| can be bounded by ϵ/2\epsilon/2-packing number, which can be bounded by (2/ϵ)nk(2/\epsilon)^{n_{k}}, using the union bound we obtain

Finally, we take t=8σ2((∑knk)log⁡(2K/K0)+log⁡(2/δ))t=\sqrt{8\sigma^{2}\left((\sum_{k}n_{k})\log(2K/K_{0})+\log(2/\delta)\right)} to obtain our claim. ∎

We note that a similar bound was proved in Nguyen et al. (2010). We believe that our proof is more concise and simple.

Assume that each entry Xi1⋯iKX_{i_{1}\cdots i_{K}} is conditionally independent given ϵ=(ϵi)i=1M\boldsymbol{\epsilon}=(\epsilon_{i})_{i=1}^{M} and distributed as

where we used the fact that ∑i1⋯∑iKu1i12⋯uKiK2=1\sum_{i_{1}}\cdots\sum_{i_{K}}u_{1i_{1}}^{2}\cdots u_{Ki_{K}}^{2}=1. Therefore, we have

2 Implication for sampling without replacement

with probability at least 1−δ1-\delta and K0=log⁡(3/2)K_{0}=\log(3/2).

This is analogous to the proof of Lemma 4 in Rohde and Tsybakov (2011). Let W1,…,WM\mathcal{W}_{1},\ldots,\mathcal{W}_{M} be tensors that each are an indicator of the observed positions. Then X=∑j=1MϵjWj\mathcal{X}=\sum_{j=1}^{M}\epsilon_{j}\mathcal{W}_{j}. Since each entry is observed maximally once, we have

Taking expectation over the choice of Wj\mathcal{W}_{j} (j=1,…,M)(j=1,\ldots,M), we obtain

References