Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin in two-dimensional optical superlattices

Z. Lan, N. Goldman, A. Bermudez, W. Lu, P. Ohberg

I Introduction

Graphene and topological insulators have recently stimulated an enormous interest at both the theoretical and experimental levels (see graphene_rev; top_insulators_rev and references therein). These two systems share an attractive and unique property, namely, the fact that the electronic transport at low energies is not governed by the usual Schrödinger equation, but rather by its relativistic counterpart: the Dirac equation greiner_book. In graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms densely packed in a honeycomb lattice graphene_rev, the band structure corresponds to a semimetallic phase whose Fermi surface consists of an even number of isolated points. Interestingly, the low-energy excitations around these points display a relativistic dispersion relation, and can be thus described by the two-dimensional Dirac Hamiltonian for massless fermions. Conversely, in three-dimensional topological insulators, which are semiconducting alloys with a strong spin-orbit coupling top_insulators_rev, the bulk band structure corresponds to a gapped insulating phase. Nonetheless, these materials also support a robust surface conductivity which can be described by an odd number of two-dimensional massless Dirac fermions. The recent interest in both graphene and topological insulators is two-fold. On the one hand, they provide concrete platforms where interesting phenomena were originally predicted in a high-energy context, for example, the Klein paradox klein_tunneling, or axion electrodynamics dyn_axion. On the other hand, they also foresee novel and useful device applications (see for example Ref. graphene_device). The emergence of massless Dirac fermions in solid-state materials is not only an exciting area of condensed matter, but is also becoming an exciting topic in cold-atom physics (see e.g. dirac_OL).

In high-energy physics, a relativistic electron is described by a spin-12\textstyle\frac{1}{2} fermion, an unavoidable fact that fixes the dimensionality of the Dirac spinor greiner_book. In clear contrast, the pseudospin of an emergent relativistic fermion in solid-state materials depends on the geometry of the underlying lattice. For graphene, the existence of two interpenetrating triangular lattices fixes the dimensionality of the Dirac spinor, which in this case corresponds to a pseudospin-12\textstyle\frac{1}{2} fermion. Recently, some researchers have studied alternative lattices, e.g., the T3\mathcal{T}_{3} lattice weyl_1, the line-centered-square (Lieb) lattice shen:2010; apaja:2010; goldmanlieb, and the Kagome lattice Green2010, where emergent massless relativistic fermions present a pseudospin-11 structure. These higher-spin relativistic fermions show some distinctive features with respect to graphene’s Dirac fermions, such as all-angle perfect tunneling shen:2010, particle localization apaja:2010, and the absence of the anomalous quantum Hall effect goldmanlieb. In view of these results, a natural question arises: could we engineer an experimental setup where massless relativistic particles with arbitrary spin emerge? Moreover, would these higher spins host novel effects that have no counterpart in the low-spin cases?

As we try to increase the pseudospin by modifying the lattice geometry, the corresponding structures become increasingly complex. Due to the limited number of two-dimensional Bravais lattices and materials that realize such lattices, this construction seems doomed to a failure. In this article, we propose an alternative approach which is based on the fact that these pseudospin structures, which arise from complex lattice geometries, can be reproduced by a standard square lattice with a matrix hopping dirac_fermions_2_3. Such a model can be engineered with an optical lattice populated by multicomponent ultracold atoms with specific state-dependent hoppings. We show that such a setup presents a rich playground where the low-energy excitations can be described by massless relativistic particles with arbitrary spin. Interestingly these fermions are governed by the Weyl-like Hamiltonian H=vFS⋅pH=v_{F}S\cdot p , which is the massless version of the Dirac Hamiltonian but can have any spin, and whose eigenstates we refer to as Dirac-Weyl fermions in this paper.

More explicitly, we demonstrate that a spin-dependent hopping, tuned according to the (2s+1)(2s+1)-dimensional representations of the su\mathfrak{su}(2) Lie algebra, directly leads to a regime where the low-energy excitations are Dirac-Weyl fermions with pseudospin ss. We show that this platform hosts two different phases at half-filling: a semimetallic phase that occurs for half-integer ss, and a metallic phase that contains a flat zero-energy band at integer ss. In the semimetallic phase, we show that a Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin can be described as a collection of spin 1/2 counterparts, where each species has a different effective speed of light. Accordingly, the low-energy transport is characterized by spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions moving at different velocities, an effect known as multi-refringence in the field of optics multirefringence. As a consequence, we find exotic tunneling properties across a potential barrier, which shows a remarkable multi-refringent Klein paradox. Additionally, we study the properties of this exotic Fermi gas in the presence of a synthetic magnetic field (see review_synthetic_gauge_fields and references therein). We find that the Weyl-Landau problem can be mapped onto a Dicke Hamiltonian dicke_model, a well-known model in quantum optics which describes the interaction of an ensemble of two-level atoms with a quantized mode of the electromagnetic radiation. From this insightful mapping, we derive the exact solution of the Hamiltonian, and predict the interesting consequences of an anomalous half-integer quantum Hall effect anomalous_qhe. These predictions are confirmed by the numerical evaluation of the topological Chern numbers cherns and edge-states hatsugai:2006, which directly give the quantum Hall sequence. We obtain a general rule describing the quantum Hall effect for Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin structures, generalizing the anomalous quantum Hall effect for pseudospin-12\frac{1}{2} in graphene graphene_rev; hatsugai:2006.

The paper is organized as follows: in Sec. II, we describe the optical lattice setup to simulate the Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin. In Sec. III, we show how to describe a single Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin as a collection of two-dimensional massless Dirac fermions, and also provide topological invariants that can be assigned to these excitations. In Sec. IV, we present the anomalous quantum Hall effect which appears when these exotic particles are subjected to a synthetic magnetic field. In Sec. V, we explore the transmission properties of these excitations in the presence of a potential barrier, leading to multirefringent Klein tunneling. In Sec. VI, we discuss how to probe various phenomena predicted in the main text. We present our conclusions in Sec. VII, and leave some technical aspects to the Appendices. In Appendix A, we describe in detail how the model Hamiltonian can be simulated using laser-assisted hopping in optical superlattices. In Appendix B, we discuss the analytical solution of the model, and the calculation of the topological invariants which characterize the emerging Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin. In Appendix C, we present the details on the calculation of the Weyl-Landau levels, the zero-energy modes, and their relation to a topological index theorem. In Appendix D, we show the impact of a flat band on the zero-energy modes. Finally, the technical aspects of the multirefringent Klein tunneling are presented in Appendix E.

II The model

Let us consider an ultracold Fermi gas of 40K atoms trapped in the periodic pattern of an optical superlattice superlattice_scheme. The ground state of this atomic gas corresponds to the hyperfine manifold with total angular momentum F=9/2F=9/2, and corresponding Zeeman sublevels mF∈{−9/2,...,9/2}m_{F}\in\{-9/2,...,9/2\}. In this work, we shall focus on a subset of N=(2s+1)N=(2s+1) internal states, which will be referred to as spins, and represented by the fermionic creation (annihilation) operators crτ†(crτ)c_{\boldsymbol{r}\tau}^{\dagger}(c_{\boldsymbol{r}\tau}). Here, r\boldsymbol{r} stands for the sites of a two-dimensional square superlattice, and τ∈{1...N}\tau\in\{1...N\} is the internal index. As described in Appendix A, we assume that the depth of the superlattice is so large that the hopping of the atoms due to kinetic energy is inhibited. Instead this tunneling shall be laser assisted by Raman transitions to certain excited states that are trapped in the secondary minima of the superlattice superlattice_scheme. Accordingly, it is possible to control externally the spin-dependent hopping of the atoms along the primary minima of the superlattice. In the non-interacting limit, which can be accessed by means of Feshbach resonances, the Hamiltonian reads

III Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin and flat bands

In this section, we show that the low-energy excitations of the su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2) Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) correspond to a particular type of relativistic particles, the so-called Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin greiner_book. Surprisingly, the spin-dependent hopping modifies the non-relativistic theory that describes the gas of ultracold atoms, and gives rise to emergent Dirac-Weyl fermions of arbitrary spin ss at low energy. In addition, we show that for half-integer spin, each Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin can be decomposed into a collection of ND=s+12N_{\text{D}}=s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2} independent 2+1 spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions. We note that this type of excitations have raised great interest in the context of graphene klein_tunneling. On the other hand, for integer spin, each Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin gives rise to ND=sN_{\text{D}}=s spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions together with a single zero-energy flat band. Recently, the physics of flat bands has also received considerable attention weyl_1; shen:2010; apaja:2010. The atomic system discussed here can be used to explore a variety of interesting effects at the forefront of condensed-matter and high-energy physics.

Transforming the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) to momentum space, crτ=1L∑ke−ikrckτc_{\boldsymbol{r}\tau}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}\sum_{\boldsymbol{k}}{\rm e}^{-{\rm i}\boldsymbol{k}\boldsymbol{r}}c_{\boldsymbol{k}\tau}, where LL is the number of lattice sites and k∈[−π,π)×[−π,π)\boldsymbol{k}\in[-\pi,\pi)\times[-\pi,\pi) lies within the first Brillouin zone, one obtains the following NN-band model

where the spinor Ψ(k)=(ck1,...,ckN)t\Psi(\boldsymbol{k})=(c_{\boldsymbol{k}1},...,c_{\boldsymbol{k}N})^{t} contains the fermionic operators. Using the properties of the su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2) Lie algebra, this Hamiltonian can be readily diagonalized (see Appendix B), leading to the following spectrum

where m=−s,...,s−1,sm=-s,...,s-1,s. We show in Fig. 1 the resulting band structures with N=2,3,4,5N=2,3,4,5 internal components. Further band structures, corresponding to configurations using more internal atomic states (N>5N>5), are easily derived from this figure. As can be observed, for N=2N=2, one recovers the familiar Dirac cones that arise in graphene klein_tunneling. Conversely, for N=3N=3 the Dirac cones are accompanied by a zero-energy flat band weyl_1. When N=4N=4 and N=5N=5, we get very interesting double-layer cones that host excitations with pseudospin 3/2 and 2 respectively (cf. below). As shown in Fig. 1 (c)-(d), these double-layer cones correspond to different effective speeds of light, therefore leading to the birefringence phenomenon.

where p=ℏ(k−KWd)\boldsymbol{p}=\hbar(\boldsymbol{k}-\boldsymbol{K}^{\boldsymbol{d}}_{\text{W}}) is the momentum around each Dirac point, and we define cν=2tν/ℏc_{\nu}=2t_{\nu}/\hbar. We stress that in the isotropic regime cx=cyc_{x}=c_{y}, the effective Hamiltonian for the excitations around KW=(π2,π2)\boldsymbol{K}_{\text{W}}=(\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}) corresponds to that of the usual Dirac-Weyl fermions. One finds HW=cpΛsH_{\text{W}}=cp\Lambda_{s}, where we have used the helicity operator Λs=S⋅pp\Lambda_{s}=\boldsymbol{S}\cdot\frac{\boldsymbol{p}}{p}, i.e. the projection of the spin along the direction of the linear momentum greiner_book. Therefore, the excitations described by Eq. (4) can be interpreted as NW=4N_{\text{W}}=4 relativistic Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin in an underlying anisotropic spacetime with an effective speed of light cx≠cyc_{x}\neq c_{y}. We stress that for N>2N>2, the SνS_{\nu} matrices do not satisfy a Clifford algebra and therefore, the Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) does not correspond to a Dirac Hamiltonian. We also note that due to the fermion doubling problem fermion_doubling, the helicity operator cannot be globally incorporated into the lattice.

At this point it is worth emphasizing that in a high-energy context, Dirac-Weyl fermions are usually associated to spin-1/2 particles. Interestingly, our experimental platform allows us to synthesize Dirac-Weyl fermions with any arbitrary spin, integer or half-integer. In fact, we find two different phases that depend upon the spin ss, and can be thus controlled experimentally.

a) Semimetallic phases: For semi-integer spin, m≠0m\neq 0 and the Fermi surface consists of NW=4N_{\text{W}}=4 isolated points (see Fig. 2). It is possible to find an appropriate basis (see Appendix B), where each Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin is described by means of ND=s+12N_{\text{D}}=s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2} spin 1/2 counterparts in 2+1 dimensions. The corresponding Hamiltonian reads

b) Metallic flat-band phases: For integer spin, we find that each Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin describes ND=sN_{\text{D}}=s spin 1/2 counterparts in 2+1 dimensions (see Appendix B). Besides, in this case, there is always a m=0m=0 spin component, and thus a zero-energy flat band. We note that the presence of this peculiar flat band shall completely modifies the properties of the system. Dispersionless energy bands have indeed remarkable consequences on single-particle and many-body properties Tasaki2008; Lieb1989; Mielke1991; Bergman2008; Green2010. In particular, for N=3N=3 our model shares great similarities with the Lieb lattice shen:2010; goldmanlieb, where the low-energy regime is also described by a spin-1 Dirac-Weyl Hamiltonian. Note that in this specific relativistic band configuration, the fermion doubling imposed by the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem for lattice fermions is substituted by the flat band Dagotto; shen:2010.

c) Topological invariants: Due to the Hamiltonian particle-hole symmetry, the zero eigenvalues are necessarily doubly degenerate and could therefore lead to non-trivial Berry phases berry_phase. We have indeed demonstrated, in Appendix B, that each of the underlying spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions carries a Berry phase γmd=2πmsgn(dxdy)\gamma^{\boldsymbol{d}}_{m}=2\pi m\text{sgn}(d_{x}d_{y}), a property also familiar from graphene klein_tunneling. Note that for half-integer spin, the Berry phase is of abnormal parity γmd=πmod(2π)\gamma^{\boldsymbol{d}}_{m}=\pi\text{mod}(2\pi), regardless of the Dirac point or Dirac-Weyl fermion. Therefore our semimetal phase (ss half-integer) has a Berry phase of π\pi which is protected by the particle-hole symmetry.

IV Weyl-Landau levels and the half-integer quantum Hall effect

a) Continuum description: Weyl-Landau levels. For small-enough gauge fields, one can show that the Peierl’s substitution leads to the usual minimal coupling performed in the effective Hamiltonian (4). The standard procedure is to replace the canonical momentum by a gauge-invariant quantity p→Π=p+eA\boldsymbol{p}\rightarrow\boldsymbol{\Pi}=\boldsymbol{p}+e\boldsymbol{A}, whose components no longer commute [Πx,Πy]=−iℏ2/lB2[\Pi_{x},\Pi_{y}]=-{\rm i}\hbar^{2}/l_{\text{B}}^{2}, where lB=ℏ/eBl_{\text{B}}=\sqrt{\hbar/eB} is the magnetic length. By introducing the bosonic creation-annihilation operators a†=lB2ℏ(Πx+iΠy)a^{\dagger}=\frac{l_{\text{B}}}{\sqrt{2}\hbar}(\Pi_{x}+{\rm i}\Pi_{y}) where a=(a†)†a=(a^{\dagger})^{\dagger}, the effective Weyl-like Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) is recast into

where we have introduced gd±=ℏ(cxdx±cydy)/(22lB)g_{\boldsymbol{d}\pm}=\hbar(c_{x}d_{x}\pm c_{y}d_{y})/(2\sqrt{2}l_{\text{B}}). Interestingly the problem of Dirac-Weyl fermions subjected to a magnetic field comment, hereafter referred to as the Weyl-Landau levels (WLLs), can be exactly mapped onto the so-called Dicke model which is well known from quantum optics dicke_model. This model, which describes the interaction between a collection of two-level atoms and a single mode of the quantized electromagnetic field, displays a wide range of interesting phenomena (see e.g. dicke_rev). In Fig. 3, we represent schematically the physical content of the Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian of Eq. (6) in the isotropic regime, namely cx=cy=:cc_{x}=c_{y}=:c, and for d=(1,1)\boldsymbol{d}=(1,1). In this situation, gd−=0g_{\boldsymbol{d}-}=0, gd+=ℏc/2lB=:gg_{\boldsymbol{d}+}=\hbar c/\sqrt{2}l_{\text{B}}=:g, and the spin raising (lowering) transitions are dressed by the annihilation (creation) of motional bosonic quanta.

In Appendix C, we present a compact way to solve the Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) for d=(1,1)\boldsymbol{d}=(1,1), in the isotropic regime cx=cyc_{x}=c_{y}. This solution is iterative in nature and allows us to take the analytical expressions of the WLLs from pseudospin ss to (s+12)(s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2}). From this method, one can derive the exact energy spectrum for different pseudospins, such as s={12,1,32,2}s=\{\textstyle\frac{1}{2},1,\frac{3}{2},2\} presented in Table 1. In Table 1, we also find that the energy spectrum of the s=12s=\textstyle\frac{1}{2} WLL is analogous to the relativistic Landau levels in graphene graphene_rev. We also observe the characteristic dependence of the energies, E∝g∝BE\propto g\propto\sqrt{B}, which is a hallmark that guarantees the relativistic nature of the particles. As can be seen in the Table 1, this peculiar dependence, E∝BE\propto\sqrt{B}, is also fulfilled in higher pseudospin cases. In the s=1s=1 case, we observe a couple of particle-hole symmetric levels with analogous properties, but also a novel zero-energy Landau level which is completely absent in the half-integer spin case. The presence of this particular zero-energy WLL will have important consequences in the quantum Hall response of the system. Finally, for s=32s=\frac{3}{2} and s=2s=2, we observe two pairs of particle-hole symmetric levels, which is a consequence of the two underlying species of spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions assigned to each Dirac point. Note also that the dependence on the number of motional quanta nn gets more involved as the pseudospin is increased.

In addition to the WLLs presented in Table 1, we also study the presence of certain special topological solutions that occur at zero energy (see the details in Appendix C). These solutions, the so-called zero-energy modes, play a key role in the quantum Hall response of the sample and give rise to the half-integer anomaly anomalous_qhe. The underlying topological modes contribute with a fractional transverse conductivity (in units of e2/he^{2}/h), even in the absence of interactions. In Table 2, we show that Dirac-Weyl fermions with a half-integer spin ss support Nz=s+12N_{\text{z}}=s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2} topological zero-modes which are protected by a topological Atiyah-Singer index theorem atiyah_index; aharonov_casher. Besides, they present half the degeneracy of higher Landau levels, and thus lead to a half-integer anomaly in the quantum Hall response. On the other hand, for integer spin ss, there are also nontopological zero-energy Landau levels that arise from the highly degenerate flat band (see Table. 1). As argued in Appendix C, these zero modes are not related to an index theorem and thus, are not protected. This highly-degenerate zero-energy band characterizing the integer-spin case is responsible for the vanishing of the half-integer anomaly. As confirmed numerically in subsection b) (cf. below), the Hall conductivity of the system fulfills

where ν=0,1,...\nu=0,1,... determines the different plateaus, and NW=4N_{\text{W}}=4 is the number of Dirac points. Therefore, as stated above, the half-integer anomaly is only valid for the half-integer spin Dirac-Weyl fermion. It is also important to note that due to the fermion doubling fermion_doubling, NW=4N_{\text{W}}=4 in our case, the fractional character of the Hall sequence is lost.

where ∣uα⟩|u_{\alpha}\rangle are single-particle eigenstates of (1) and where the Chern numbers associated to each occupied band, Nch(band)N_{\text{ch}}(\text{band}), can be efficiently computed using the method of Ref. cherns. Here EFE_{\text{F}} denotes the Fermi energy, which can be tuned in our setup by varying the atomic filling.

Before analyzing the specific Hall plateaus of the systems associated to different spin structures, let us draw their energy spectra E=E(Φ)E=E(\Phi) as a function of the dimensionless magnetic flux Φ=2πBa2\Phi=2\pi Ba^{2}. These computed spectra generalize the famous Hofstadter butterfly hofstadter. The fractal butterfly spectra corresponding to the cases N=2,3,4,5N=2,3,4,5 are illustrated in Fig.4. For N=2N=2, one recovers the spectrum of the π\pi-flux model hatsugai:2006. For N=3N=3 one observes a spectrum similar to the Lieb lattice aoki:1996; goldmanlieb, which highlights the similarity between these two models that share a spin-1 configuration. We note the existence of a highly-degenerate flat band lying exactly at zero energy. For N>3N>3, the spectra become more complex and show complicated overlaps between butterfly-like substructures. In particular, one identifies two overlapping butterflies in Fig. 4(c)-(d), each of which belongs to one of the two species of spin-1/21/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions for s=3/2s=3/2 and s=2s=2. We note that for integer spin (NN odd), the central flat band at E=0E=0 remains robust for all flux Φ\Phi.

The Hall plateaus corresponding to N=2,3,4,5N=2,3,4,5 are illustrated in Fig. 5. We expect the Hall sequences to be compatible with the continuum analysis in the low flux regime, and we therefore set Φ=1/51\Phi=1/51 in this analysis. We also focus on the low-energy range, where the description in terms of Weyl-Landau levels is valid. First we note that for all the cases (Fig. 5 (a)-(d)), steps of NW=4N_{\text{W}}=4 are observed in the ranges EF<0E_{\text{F}}<0 (hole) and EF>0E_{\text{F}}>0 (particles). The differences between these several Hall sequences occur at half-filling (EF=0E_{\text{F}}=0), where the flat band and the number of zero modes play a fundamental role. For N=2N=2 (spin-12\textstyle\frac{1}{2}), one observes a central step of NWNZ=4×1=4N_{\text{W}}N_{\text{Z}}=4\times 1=4, while for N=4N=4 (spin-32\frac{3}{2}), one gets a central step of NWNZ=4×2=8N_{\text{W}}N_{\text{Z}}=4\times 2=8. This numerical results confirm the prediction of Eq. (7) based on the analytical expressions for the Dirac points, and zero-energy modes derived earlier.

For general NN even (half-integer spin), one indeed obtains that the two central plateaus, around half-filling, are given by σxy=±NWNZ/2\sigma_{xy}=\pm N_{\text{W}}N_{\text{Z}}/2 (in units of e2/he^{2}/h), therefore giving a fundamental signature of the number of Dirac points and zero modes.

For NN odd (integer spin), one finds a vanishing contribution of the zero modes to the Hall conductivity: a Hall plateau corresponding to σxy\sigma_{xy}=0 is clearly observed in the vicinity of EF=0E_{\text{F}}=0 (cf. Fig. 5 (b),(d)). One can understand the vanishing of the half-integer anomaly as a consequence of the lack of an index theorem for the zero modes comment2. Note that this general result is in perfect agreement with the Hall sequences computed for the T3\mathcal{T}_{3} weyl_1 and Lieb goldmanlieb lattices (i.e. lattices with pseudospin 1).

In order to deepen our understanding of the different Hall conductivity plateaus for odd and even NN cases, we further investigate the associated edge-states, which can be obtained by diagonalizing the system in a cylindrical geometry. In other words, the topological properties hidden in the bulk (i.e. the Chern numbers) may be visible around the boundaries by the holographic bulk-to-edge correspondence hatsugai:2006. This correspondence is based on the fact that the edge-states carry the Hall current along the boundaries of the system. In Fig. 6, we show the corresponding energy spectra E=E(k)E=E(k), where kk is a Bloch parameter, for N=2N=2 (half-integer spin) and N=3N=3 (integer spin). Note that Fig. 6 (a) is similar to the spectrum of graphene [cf. Fig. 21 in Ref. graphene_rev], and highlights the anomalous quantum Hall effect that occurs for half-integer spins: the contribution of the zero modes at half-filling confirms the aforementioned result σxy(EF=0+)=NWNZ/2\sigma_{xy}(E_{\text{F}}=0^{+})=N_{\text{W}}N_{\text{Z}}/2 (in units of e2/he^{2}/h). In Fig. 6 (a), we observe that each boundary is populated by two edge-states: this is due to the presence of four Dirac points in the first Brillouin zone (in contrast with the two Dirac points of graphene that lead to a single edge-state). Fig. 6 (b) emphasizes the absence of gapless edge-states in the first gap above E=0E=0, as observed for all the cases corresponding to odd NN. This analysis confirms the general result presented in Eq. (7).

The absence of an anomalous quantum Hall effect for integer ss is certainly interesting. As discussed above, this effect is also manifested by the zero Hall plateau around EF=0E_{\text{F}}=0 (cf. Fig. 5 (b),(d)) or by the absence of visible edge-states stemming from the zero energy modes (cf. Fig. 6 (b)). The absence of an index theorem in this case prevents the robustness of the topological zero modes and therefore, it is reasonable to argue that they cannot contribute to the Hall conductivity (since this physical observable is topologically protected). Furthermore, the localized properties of the states rooted in the flat band apaja:2010 could also explain that their associated zero-modes would potentially contribute to edge-states with zero velocity (i.e. they would not contribute to the Hall conductivity). The latter effect is further detailed in Appendix D.

V Klein multi-refringence tunnelling

It was shown in klein_tunneling that due to the coupling of positive and negative chirality channels outside and inside a potential barrier, quantum tunneling of Dirac particles in graphene becomes highly anisotropic, and the barrier remains perfectly transparent for normal incidence. The fermionic and bosonic Klein paradox are both discussed in the literature (see Bosonic KT and references therein). It was shown that while the central mechanism for fermionic Klein tunneling is the Pauli exclusion principle, the key to bosonic Klein tunneling is stimulated emission. Jakubsky et al. klein_supersymmetry were able to show that for normal incidence, the potential can be gauged away by a unitary transformation, leaving a free particle dynamics in disguise, where a unitary equivalence between the transformed Hamiltonians becomes encoded in a supersymmetry algebra. Evidence for Klein tunneling has been obtained from graphene pn junction klein_graphene_pn1; klein_graphene_pn2 and most recently been simulated using trapped ions klein_simulation_ions.

The different helicities carried by the Dirac-Weyl fermions can naturally couple inside the barrier, but there is also a possibility to transform one helicity to another outside the barrier, resulting in a remarkable multirefringence phenomenon familiar from optics multirefringence. In Appendix E we present a detailed treatment of the Klein tunneling of Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin. Using the equations introduced there, a numerical investigation of the double-layered cone structure of spin 3/23/2 particles shows that Klein-birefringence is indeed present (see Fig. 7 for a schematic overview). The incident energy of the particle is EE, where the barrier width is DD and height V0V_{0} respectively. The incident particle is chosen to follow the outer layer cone. As such, the evanescent waves do not cause a cutoff for any helicity outside the barrier, see Fig. 7(b).

Fig. 8 shows the transmission of spin 3/23/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions when the width and height of the barrier changes. For normal incidence, the barrier is perfectly transparent as in graphene klein_tunneling, see Fig. 8(a). When the incident angle deviates from normal incidence, the component following the inner cone shows periodic peaks in the transmission, which is the hallmark of birefringence. There are no resonant conditions, where the barrier would become perfectly transparent at certain incident angles, apart from normal incidence. For lower barriers, evanescent waves play an important role when coupling helicities outside and inside the barrier, as shown in the two lowest panels in Fig. 8(a) and Fig. 8(b). For a low enough barrier, and for an incident wave beyond the critical angle θc1=arcsin((V0−E)/cℏkh1),h1=1/2\theta_{c1}=arcsin((V_{0}-E)/c\hbar kh_{1}),h_{1}=1/2, all the helicities coupled inside the barrier are evanescent waves, hence there is no transmission for any component as shown in Fig. 8(b). For a combination whose critical angle is θc2=arcsin((V0−E)/cℏkh2)\theta_{c2}=arcsin((V_{0}-E)/c\hbar kh_{2}) and h2=3/2h_{2}=3/2, there is only one negative helicity of h1=1/2h_{1}=1/2 inside the barrier which is coupled in the form of a propagating wave. The transmission properties are consequently modified dramatically in this regime, see Fig. 8(b). These two boundaries stemming from the helicities of h1=1/2h_{1}=1/2 and h2=3/2h_{2}=3/2 are clearly visible in Fig. 8(b). Herein lies the paradox. For low barriers, there is no transmission, while for high barriers, the transmission is high. For the case of an incident particle following the inner cone, there is an additional cutoff condition exerted by evanescent waves with helicity h2=3/2h_{2}=3/2 outside the barrier, i.e., beyond the critical angle θc=arcsin(h1/h2)=arcsin(1/3)=0.34\theta_{c}=arcsin(h_{1}/h_{2})=arcsin(1/3)=0.34, a particle with helicity h2=3/2h_{2}=3/2 cannot be transmitted.

For n-layered cones we obtain similar results, where inside the barrier the presence of evanescent waves will exert a cutoff for each helicity, where with increasing barrier height transmission is gradually allowed for the different helicities. Outside the barrier, the evanescent waves only exert a cutoff when a small helicity is transformed to a large one. The transmission spectrum typically shows n-refringence, which we refer to as Klein multirefringent Tunneling. This multi-refringence is a result of the rather unique and non-trivial helicity of these Dirac-Weyl fermions.

VI Detection

The experimental realisations of the proposed scenarios and the detection of the resulting effects are certainly challenging but should still be within experimental reach with state of the art trapping and manipulation of atomic ensembles. Any detection scheme capable of resolving the effects discussed in this paper will typically have to be able to distinguish between spin states, particle density and momentum distribution. We briefly outline here some of the possible techniques one can use, and refer the reader to tqpt for an extensive discussion about detection methods of exotic quasi particles in optical lattices.

Regarding the number of Dirac points we note that this can be addressed by measuring the atom density close to a zero chemical potential zhu2007. To obtain the number of zero modes and the number of Dirac points one can evaluate, or indeed measure, the Hall conductivity around half-filling. This could be achieved using the Streda formula based on the atomic density which can be measured precisely by the in situ individual atom detection as in Ref. SAD1; SAD2. In addition, a measurement of the atom density as a function of the chemical potential allows us to map the density of states (DOSs), where the Van Hove singularities in the DOSs are directly related to the number of layers of the cone structure, see Ref. dirac_fermions_2_3. By mapping out the momentum distribution using atomic angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) Ref. ARPES, momentum-resolved Bragg spectroscopy Ref. MRBS, or adiabatic release Ref. release, allows us to map the fermi surface and thus the location of each Dirac points.

The existence of a flat band with integer spin can be detected by its energy dispersion and its related wave function. The flat band gives a peak in the DOSs weyl_1, which can be detected by measuring the atomic density. More importantly, the localization properties resulting from the flat band could also be detected apaja:2010. This localization can be observed after the weak harmonic confinement of the atoms is removed but with the optical lattice kept in place: the atoms occupying the Dirac cones will fly away fast while the atoms occupying the flat band will remain stuck in the immobile flat band states as shown in apaja:2010. In our system, this localization property should be observed for NN odd and can be understood by observing the vanishing of the Dirac-Weyl spinor components corresponding to odd cyclotron modes (see for instance Eq.(21) in Appendix C) – in direct analogy with the flat band wave function of the Lieb lattice. The vanishing of the components corresponding to the odd cyclotron modes of the Dirac Weyl spinor can also be confirmed by the color resolution strategies summarized in Ref. tqpt.

The presence of edge states in the bulk gap above half-filling Ref. edge-Bragg; edge-Sarma; edge-Nathan is an intriguing concept. For this undoubtedly challenging endeavor one would need to engineer a sharp boundary, with a characteristic length on the order of the lattice constant, in order to stabilize the presence of topological edge-states within the center of the trap edge-Nathan. Loading the atoms into the edge states can be achieved with external light pulses edge-Sarma; edge-Nathan. In addition, the dynamical structure factor S(q,ω)S({\bf q},\omega) from light Bragg scattering can also provide a direct way to observe the edge states and bulk states as demonstrated in Ref. edge-Bragg. The lack of edge-states in the bulk gaps around half-filling could be an important indicator of the existence of a flat band.

To detect the Klein tunneling the most natural approach seems to be designing a potential barrier for the atoms by optical or magnetic means, and prepare the atoms with a well defined momentum, then see if particles have tunneled through the barrier to the other region. However, a direct confirmation of the Klein multirefringent tunneling would require a launch of a multicomponent mass current. To launch such a mass current, several schemes can be used. For example, one can connect the optical lattice to two reservoirs with different chemical potentials as in atomtronics1; atomtronics2, exert a static force from a tilted optical lattice static-forcing, or by an effective electric field on the atoms from the optical dipole force electric-field. Measuring the mass current across the barrier will consequently reveal the intricate dependence on helicity for the tunneling dynamics.

VII Conclusions and Outlook

In this paper, we have proposed the quantum simulation of Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin by a particular laser-assisted tunneling in optical lattices. By tuning the spin-dependent hopping according to the su\mathfrak{su}(2) Lie algebra, we can assign an arbitrary spin ss to these fermions, and go beyond the standard spin-12\textstyle\frac{1}{2} regime of high-energy physics.

We have presented a detailed study, both analytically and numerically, of several striking aspects of Dirac-Weyl fermions. In particular, our system hosts two different phases: a semi-metallic phase for half-integer ss, and a metallic phase that contains a flat zero-energy band for integer spin ss. We have shown that the low-energy transport in the semi-metallic phase is characterized by multirefringent spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions moving at different speeds. As a consequence, we also find an exotic Klein tunneling across a potential barrier. In the presence of a synthetic magnetic field, we have connected the Weyl-Landau problem to the Dicke model known from quantum optics. The corresponding Hamiltonian presents a rich structure of Weyl-Landau levels and zero-energy modes whose robustness can be related to an index theorem for half-integer ss, which also includes an anomalous half-integer quantum Hall effect.

Many interesting avenues remain however unexplored. It is possible to engineer a mass term by a particular on-site Raman transition dirac_fermions_2_3 in order to explore a massive regime and even look for a topological insulating phase. Another interesting possibility is to engineer a curved spacetime background following dirac_curved, and study the effects of the higher spin of these Dirac-Weyl fermions. One can also separate each spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl component of the Dirac-Weyl fermions with high spin by an appropriate tailoring of the spin-dependent hopping tqpt; shen:2010, which could potentially lead to interesting topological quantum phase transitions. An intriguing supersymmetric algebraic structure klein_supersymmetry also deserves further attention in the Klein multi-refringent regime. We thus believe that several new effects can be explored starting from the results presented in this work.

Acknowledgements. Z. L acknowledges the financial support from SUPA (Scottish Universities Physics Alliance). A.B. thanks MICINN FIS2009-10061, CAM QUITEMAD, European FET-7 PICC and HIP, UCM-BS GICC-910758, and acknowledges very useful discussions with L. Mazza. N.G. thanks the F.R.S-F.N.R.S. for financial support, and also V. Wens, F. Gerbier, D. Bercioux and J. Dalibard for interesting discussions. P.Ö acknowledges support from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland. We thank R. Shen for an interesting discussion regarding the boundary conditions for the Klein tunneling.

Note added. After the submission of this work, another manuscript appeared which explored the same idea of Dirac-Weyl fermions with high spin but in a different setup Dora.

Appendix A Experimental realization of spin-dependent hopping

In this Appendix, we describe the main ingredients of a method to engineer the spin-dependent tunneling superlattice_scheme that leads to the Hamiltonian in Eq (1). We consider a cloud of ultracold 40K atoms described by the fermionic field operators cxτ†(cxτ)c_{\boldsymbol{x}\tau}^{\dagger}(c_{\boldsymbol{x}\tau}), where τ∈{1...N}\tau\in\{1...N\} is the internal index that labels a particular subset of Zeeman sublevels in the ground state L=0,F=9/2L=0,F=9/2, and x\boldsymbol{x} stands for the sites of a two-dimensional square superlattice. This particular superlattice follows from the optical potential created by two pairs of counter-propagating lasers along each axis α\alpha, V(xα)=V1∑jcos⁡2(kLxα)+V2∑jcos⁡2(2kLxα)V({x}_{\alpha})=V_{1}\sum_{j}\cos^{2}(k_{\text{L}}x_{\alpha})+V_{2}\sum_{j}\cos^{2}(2k_{\text{L}}x_{\alpha}), where V1≫V2V_{1}\gg V_{2} represent the lattice depths, and kLk_{\text{L}} an optical wavevector. As shown in Fig. 9, the atoms are trapped in a periodic structure of primary and secondary minima, that shall be referred to as sites r\boldsymbol{r}, and links l\boldsymbol{l} henceforth. For a deep optical superlattice, the atomic tunneling between neighboring sites will be completely suppressed. The fundamental idea to engineer a spin-dependent hopping is to assist this tunneling using additional lasers that drive a Raman transition to an excited state in the hyperfine manifold F=M=7/2F=M=7/2 (see Fig. 9), here represented by the fermionic operators dx†(dx)d_{\boldsymbol{x}}^{\dagger}(d_{\boldsymbol{x}}). The use of a pair of lasers in a Raman configuration is two-fold. On the one hand, the effective frequency can be tuned to the microwave transition F=9/2↔F=7/2F=9/2\leftrightarrow F=7/2. On the other hand, the effective wavevector can be large so that the lasers impart enough momentum to the atoms to tunnel between neighboring lattice sites. As customary cohen_book, such a two-photon transition is obtained after the adiabatic elimination of a higher excited state in the fine structure L=1L=1. The Raman lasers aligned along a particular hopping direction, not only drive the transition between the hyperfine levels, but also transfer a finite momentum to the atoms which allows them to tunnel to a neighboring site. This assisted hopping synthetic_gauge is described by the following Hamiltonian

where Ωτeff\Omega^{\text{eff}}_{\tau} is the two-photon Rabi frequency driving the transition ∣F=9/2,τ⟩↔∣F=7/2,7/2⟩|F=9/2,\tau\rangle\leftrightarrow|F=7/2,7/2\rangle, and Sxx′=⟨x∣eikRr∣x′⟩=∫d3rwx∗(r)eikRrwx′(r)S_{\boldsymbol{x}\boldsymbol{x}^{\prime}}=\langle\boldsymbol{x}|{\rm e}^{{\rm i}\boldsymbol{k}_{\text{R}}\boldsymbol{r}}|\boldsymbol{x}^{\prime}\rangle=\int d^{3}rw^{*}_{\boldsymbol{x}}(\boldsymbol{r}){\rm e}^{{\rm i}\boldsymbol{k}_{\text{R}}\boldsymbol{r}}w_{\boldsymbol{x}^{\prime}}(\boldsymbol{r}) determines the momentum transfer that the Raman lasers impart on the atom, thus assisting the transition between neighboring superlattice sites. The parameters of this two-photon Raman transition ωR=ω1−ω2\omega_{\text{R}}=\omega_{1}-\omega_{2}, and kR=k1−k2\boldsymbol{k}_{\text{R}}=\boldsymbol{k}_{1}-\boldsymbol{k}_{2}, follow from each laser frequency and wavevector. Here, we have introduced the corresponding Wannier functions wx(r)w_{\boldsymbol{x}}(\boldsymbol{r}). In the expression of Sxx′S_{\boldsymbol{x}\boldsymbol{x}^{\prime}}, one sees the importance of using a two-photon Raman scheme rather than a simple microwave, since the integral between neighboring Wannier functions will only be finite when the imparted momentum is large (i.e. the effective wavelength is on the order of the lattice spacing λR≈a\lambda_{\rm R}\approx a, typically a few hundred nanometers). As shown in superlattice_scheme, by selecting an appropriate detuning, Zeeman splitting, and lattice staggering, it is possible to perform an adiabatic elimination of the auxiliary states dx†(dx)d_{\boldsymbol{x}}^{\dagger}(d_{\boldsymbol{x}}) that reside on the links, and thus obtain an effective Hamiltonian that describes the hopping of F=9/2F=9/2 atoms along the primary sites of a two-dimensional lattice. Therefore, the auxiliary link serves as a bus that allows us to assist the tunneling, and one obtains the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (1)

Appendix B Dirac-Weyl fermions and topological invariants

In this Appendix, we show how to describe a single Dirac-Weyl fermion with high spin as a collection of spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions, and also give an explicit derivation of the topological charges that can be assigned to these excitations. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) can be diagonalized using a similarity transformation for the su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2) Lie algebra puri_book. In particular, the su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2) rotation

brings the Hamiltonian into a diagonal form

The block structure of the Hamiltonian (13), allow us to easily derive the effective description in terms of spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions

and we have introduced hmk=2txmcos⁡kx+2itymcos⁡kyh_{m\boldsymbol{k}}=2t_{x}m\cos k_{x}+2{\rm i}t_{y}m\cos k_{y}. Performing the line integrals, it can be shown that the topological charges around the Dirac points read μd=NDsgn(dxdy)\mu^{\boldsymbol{d}}=N_{\text{D}}\text{sgn}(d_{x}d_{y}), where ND=(2s+1)/2N_{\text{D}}=(2s+1)/2. Accordingly, the charges are integer values, and their sign depends on the particular Dirac point dx,dy∈{−1,1}d_{x},d_{y}\in\{-1,1\} under consideration. For particle-hole preserving perturbations, only when two opposite charges meet, a quantum phase transition can take place. Therefore, on very general grounds, we can claim that the semimetallic phase is topologically protected.

Appendix C Analytical solution of the Weyl Landau levels, topological zero-energy modes and the Index theorem

In this Appendix, we derive the exact solution of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (6), and describe the appearance of multiple zero-energy modes which are responsible for the half-integer anomaly in the quantum Hall sequence.

Complete analytical solution: In this part of the Appendix, we derive the exact solution of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) for the Dirac point d=(+1,+1)\boldsymbol{d}=(+1,+1), and in the isotropic regime cx=cyc_{x}=c_{y}. To do this, we write out the matrix elements explicitly as HWLd=gd+∑n,m[Enmδn,m+1ρma†+Enmδn,m−1ρna]H^{\boldsymbol{d}}_{\text{WL}}=g_{\mathbf{d}+}\sum_{n,m}[E_{nm}\delta_{n,m+1}\rho_{m}a^{{\dagger}}+E_{nm}\delta_{n,m-1}\rho_{n}a], where ρn=n(2s+1−n)\rho_{n}=\sqrt{n(2s+1-n)} and EnmE_{nm} is the (2s+1)×(2s+1)(2s+1)\times(2s+1) matrix with 1 at row nn and column mm, and zeros otherwise. The eigenvector can be expressed as Ψ=(ϕ1,ϕ2,⋯ ,ϕ2s+1)t\Psi=(\phi_{1},\phi_{2},\cdots,\phi_{2s+1})^{t}, and the eigen-equations are the following operator equations ρi−1a†ϕi−1−ϵϕi+ρiaϕi+1=0\rho_{i-1}a^{{\dagger}}\phi_{i-1}-\epsilon\phi_{i}+\rho_{i}a\phi_{i+1}=0 with i=1,2,⋯ ,2s+1i=1,2,\cdots,2s+1. We solve the Weyl-Landau levels by successive substitutions, i.e., we substitute the second equation into the first one, and then substitute the third one to the result obtained by the previous substitution and repeat the process (see Table 3). After rr substitutions, we get Ar,i(aa†)i−1ϕr=ρrBr,j(aa†)j−1aϕr+1A_{r,i}(aa^{{\dagger}})^{i-1}\phi_{r}=\rho_{r}B_{r,j}(aa^{{\dagger}})^{j-1}a\phi_{r+1}, where Ar,iA_{r,i} and Br,jB_{r,j} are energy-dependent constants, using the Einstein summation convention for repeated indexes ii,jj. Setting ρra†ϕr=ϵϕr+1−ρr+1aϕr+2\rho_{r}a^{{\dagger}}\phi_{r}=\epsilon\phi_{r+1}-\rho_{r+1}a\phi_{r+2} , we get Ar,i(a†a)i−1(ϵϕr+1−ρr+1aϕr+2)=Br,jρr(a†a)jϕr+1A_{r,i}(a^{{\dagger}}a)^{i-1}(\epsilon\phi_{r+1}-\rho_{r+1}a\phi_{r+2})=B_{r,j}\rho_{r}(a^{{\dagger}}a)^{j}\phi_{r+1}. Recasting the expression, we obtain

where (nm){n\choose m} is a binomial coefficient and [r][r] is the integer part of rr. By using the cutoff condition ρ2s+1=0\rho_{2s+1}=0 , the Weyl-Landau levels are obtained compactly as

where A2s+1,iA_{2s+1,i} are determined by the recursion above with initial values A1,1=ϵA_{1,1}=\epsilon and B1,1=1B_{1,1}=1. Here, n is the eigenvalue of the number operator a†aa^{{\dagger}}a for the Fock state ∣n⟩|n\rangle. The eigenvector is then expressed as: Ψns=(f2s(n,ϵ)∣n−2s⟩,f2s−1(n,ϵ)∣n−2s+1⟩,⋯ ,f0(n,ϵ)∣n⟩)t\Psi_{n}^{s}=(f_{2s}(n,\epsilon)|n-2s\rangle,f_{2s-1}(n,\epsilon)|n-2s+1\rangle,\cdots,f_{0}(n,\epsilon)|n\rangle)^{t}, where fi(n,ϵ)f_{i}(n,\epsilon) are determined by the algebraic equation

with i=1,2,…,2s+1i=1,2,\ldots,2s+1. For s=1/2s=1/2 and s=1s=1, the results in Table 3 confirm the results in klein_tunneling; shen:2010. However, the general expression here is applicable to any arbitrary spin. The Weyl-Landau states of these high spin particles are a mixture of successive non-relativistic Landau Levels, i.e. the spin and orbital degrees of freedom of Ψns\Psi_{n}^{s} are highly entangled. This entanglement is a source of many interesting topics, like the mesoscopic superposition states in relativistic Landau levels dirac_cats, possible fractional Hall states with high Landau-level index and non-fractional to fractional QHE transition fqhe_graphene, and non- abelian anyons non_abelain_anyons_atoms. We note that our Weyl-Landau problem can be mapped to a single-mode Dicke model which shows a quantum phase transition from the normal to superradiant state (i.e. the ground state has a large Weyl-Landau index n) in the limit of s→∞s\to\infty. This may be the way forward to realize a stable fractional QHE state with higher Weyl-Landau index nn in this kind of system when the interaction is turned on.

Each of these subspaces hosts a zero-energy mode of the Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian. By introducing the following quantities fn,s,m=gn(s(s+1)−m(m+1))f_{n,s,m}=g\sqrt{n(s(s+1)-m(m+1))}, where gg is the coupling constant introduced in the Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian of Eq. 6, one finds the following zero-energy modes for which H∣E0⟩=0H|E_{0}\rangle=0:

where we have omitted an irrelevant normalization factor. By simple counting, we find that the Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian hosts Nz=s+12N_{\text{z}}=s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2} zero-energy modes for half-integer spin. Interestingly, the number of zero-modes coincides with the number of the spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions contained by a single high spin Dirac-Weyl fermion. Therefore, one may argue that each underlying spin 1/2 Dirac-Weyl fermion hosts a single zero-energy mode, which shall be responsible for a half-integer anomaly in the quantum Hall response of the system (see Eq. 7). Conversely, the number of zero modes for integer spin is not bounded (see Table 1).

Index theorem and robustness of zero modes: We have already seen two physical manifestations of topology, namely, the topological charge, or the abnormal Berry phase, that can be assigned to each of the Dirac-Weyl fermions (Sec. III), and the Chern numbers that determine the quantum Hall response of the system (Sec. IV). In this part of the Appendix, we describe yet another manifestation of topology: the relation of the zero modes to the Atiyah-Singer theorem atiyah_index. This famous theorem, which relates the analytical and topological features of differential operators, has important consequences on the properties of Dirac-Weyl fermions subjected to external gauge fields qhe_graphene. Graphene therefore has turned out to be an excellent platform to understand this relationship both from a theoretical pachos_index and experimental viewpoint qhe_graphene. In this Appendix, we describe how these concepts can be generalized to Dirac-Weyl fermions of arbitrary spin ss, and we find that only the zero modes of half-integer spin Dirac-Weyl fermions are protected by the topological features of the system. As discussed in Sec. IV, this justifies the absence of the half-integer anomaly for integer-spin Dirac-Weyl fermions.

The Weyl-Landau Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) for d=(+1,+1)\boldsymbol{d}=(+1,+1) in the isotropic regime cx=cyc_{x}=c_{y} presents the following particle-hole symmetry

where the differential operators D=P−HWLdP+:H+→H−D=P_{-}H_{\text{WL}}^{\boldsymbol{d}}P_{+}:\mathcal{H}_{+}\to\mathcal{H}_{-}, and D†=P+HWLdP−:H−→H+D^{\dagger}=P_{+}H_{\text{WL}}^{\boldsymbol{d}}P_{-}:\mathcal{H}_{-}\to\mathcal{H}_{+}, join the orthogonal subspaces. In this language, the analytical index of the supercharge can be expressed as

For elliptic operators nakahara_book, this index can be related to the topological features of the system via the famous Atiyah-Singer index theorem. This relationship not only gives insight into the number of zero modes in the system, but also pinpoints their robustness with respect to local perturbations of the Hamiltonian. From the results in Tables 1 and 2, we observe that

and therefore the total number of zero modes determines the index indQ=s+12\text{ind}\mathcal{Q}=s+\textstyle\frac{1}{2}, which is related to the total magnetic flux that pierces the system. Therefore, these zero modes are extremely robust with respect to local perturbations of the Hamiltonian. Conversely, the number of zero modes for integer spin is unbounded (see Table 1). In this case, the differential operator DD is not an elliptical operator comment2, and thus the Index theorem does not apply. Accordingly, the zero modes for an integer-spin Dirac-Weyl fermion are not topologically protected.

Appendix D Flat band, zero modes and Hall conductivity

In Section IV, we have demonstrated that Dirac-Weyl particles with integer spin ss do not present the anomalous (half-integer) quantum Hall effect. Namely, we have shown the absence of edge-states stemming from the zero modes, therefore leading to a zero Hall plateau above half-filling. This effect is particularly interesting as it seems to be rooted in the absence of an index theorem that guaranties the robustness of these topological zero modes. An alternative explanation comes from the possibility that edge-states with zero velocity could be hidden in the flat band and would therefore not contribute to the Hall conductivity.

The squeezing of the edge-states, namely the fact that their dispersion relation is given by E(k)=0E(k)=0 for integer ss, can be investigated in a model that extrapolates continuously between the case of Dirac-Weyl particles with integer and half-integer spin. Such a model has been introduced by Kennett et al. Kennett2010. This model has four sites in its unit cell and contains a fundamental parameter β\beta: When β=1\beta=1, the model is equivalent to the Lieb lattice goldmanlieb, therefore describing a spin-1 Dirac-Weyl particle and displaying a flat band. For arbitrary β\beta, the energy spectrum displays two interpenetrating cones and thus describes a spin-3/23/2 Dirac-Weyl particle.

We have computed the Hall conductivity for this model, and we find that σH=±e2/h\sigma_{H}=\pm e^{2}/h around half-filling for β≠1\beta\neq 1. This is in perfect agreement with the fact that the model displays a single Dirac point, ND=1N_{D}=1 with NZ=2N_{Z}=2 zero modes (cf. Eq. (7)). For β=1\beta=1, one observes a zero Hall conductivity plateau at half-filling, as expected for a spin-1 Dirac-Weyl particle. Therefore, this model is well suited to investigate the fate of the edge-states as one goes from σH=±e2/h\sigma_{H}=\pm e^{2}/h (half-integer spin) to σH=0\sigma_{H}=0 (integer spin) around half-filling.

This analysis emphasizes the existence of edge-states with zero velocity within the flat band, in the presence of a magnetic field. While we have demonstrated this property for Kennett’s model, which is equivalent to the Lieb lattice in the limit β→1\beta\rightarrow 1, we believe that it should be applicable to general systems exhibiting Dirac-Weyl particles with integer spin.

Appendix E Klein paradox and multi-refringence

In this Appendix we give a general description of the Klein multi-refringence of the Dirac-Weyl fermions with arbitrary spin. We shall consider the isotropic, cx=cy=cc_{x}=c_{y}=c, Weyl-like Hamiltonian in Eq. (4), which is valid for low-momentum excitations around the Dirac point d=(+1,+1)\boldsymbol{d}=(+1,+1), i.e., HWd(k)=∑νcℏSνkνH_{\text{W}}^{\boldsymbol{d}}(\boldsymbol{k})=\sum_{\nu}c\hbar S_{\nu}k_{\nu}. For simplicity, we consider a spin-ss Dirac-Weyl particle tunneling through a rectangular potential barrier with potential V0V_{0} in the interval 0<x<D0<x<D and zero elsewhere. The particle is incident on the interface at x=0x=0 at an angle θ\theta from the interface normal (see Fig. 7 ). The plane-wave part of the solution is ei(kxx+kyy){\rm e}^{{\rm i}(k_{x}x+k_{y}y)}, where kx=kcos⁡θk_{x}=k\cos\theta and ky=ksin⁡θk_{y}=k\sin\theta. Due to the particle-hole symmetry, the helicities form [s+1/2][s+1/2] pairs, where [s][s] stands for the integer part of s. For incident particles with energy V0>E>0V_{0}>E>0, and helicity h0h_{0} (i.e. the helicity determines the corresponding energy E=cℏkh0)E=c\hbar kh_{0})), all negative-helicity channels are coupled inside the potential barrier with the relation (E−V0)=cℏkinhh(E-V_{0})=c\hbar k_{in}^{h}h, and kin,xh=kinhcos⁡ϕinhk_{in,x}^{h}=k_{in}^{h}\cos\phi_{in}^{h} and kin,yh=kinhsin⁡ϕinhk_{in,y}^{h}=k_{in}^{h}\sin\phi_{in}^{h} . Outside the potential barrier, helicity h0h_{0} is allowed to convert to other positive values under the condition of energy and momentum conservation, i.e., kouthh=kh0k_{out}^{h}h=kh_{0} and kout,xh=kouthcos⁡ϕouthk_{out,x}^{h}=k_{out}^{h}\cos\phi_{out}^{h} and kout,yh=kouthsin⁡ϕouthk_{out,y}^{h}=k_{out}^{h}\sin\phi_{out}^{h}. Due to the conservation of parallel wavevectors in the tunneling process, one has kinhsin⁡ϕinh=ksin⁡θ=kouthsin⁡ϕouthk_{in}^{h}\sin\phi_{in}^{h}=k\sin\theta=k_{out}^{h}\sin\phi_{out}^{h}. Note that a non-zero helicity is not allowed to convert into a zero helicity due to the violation of energy conservation. The wave function in the three regions is:

where the spinor ϕRh(ϕLh)\phi_{R}^{h}(\phi_{L}^{h}) is the eigenvector of HWdH_{\text{W}}^{\boldsymbol{d}} with helicity hh for the right (left) moving wave. Note that ϕinh\phi_{in}^{h} and ϕouth\phi_{out}^{h} for left moving waves are obtained by using the (π−ϕinh)(\pi-\phi_{in}^{h}) and (π−ϕouth)(\pi-\phi_{out}^{h}) angles in the solution for the right moving wave. Here, rh,Ah,Bhr_{h},A_{h},B_{h} and tht_{h} are 4[s+1/2]4[s+1/2] unknown parameters to be determined. By integrating the equation HWdΨ=EΨH_{\text{W}}^{\boldsymbol{d}}\Psi=E\Psi over an interval in the vicinity of the interface, the boundary conditions are obtained. For half-integer spin, the boundary conditions require the continuity of each component of the (2s+12s+1)-component spinor at the two boundaries of x=0x=0 and x=Dx=D, which give 4s+24s+2 equations that equal to the number of unknowns, 4[s+1/2]=4s+24[s+1/2]=4s+2 for half-integer spin. However, for integer spin where even and odd components of the spinor are decoupled, the boundary conditions require the continuity of each even spinor component, together with the continuity of a sum of two neighbouring odd components at x=0x=0 and x=Dx=D (specifically, continuity of ρ2i−1Ψ2i−1+ρ2iΨ2i+1\rho_{2i-1}\Psi_{2i-1}+\rho_{2i}\Psi_{2i+1} with i=1,…,si=1,\ldots,s). These conditions give 4s4s equations that also equal to the number of unknowns, 4[s+1/2]=4s4[s+1/2]=4s for integer spin. Thus, in principle, the tunneling properties can be completely determined by the wavefunction and boundary conditions. Since different helicity spinors carry a different current, the transmission and reflection coefficients have to be renormalized with respect to the incident current, i.e.,Th=th2[ϕRh†SxϕRh]/[ϕRh0†SxϕRh0]T_{h}=t_{h}^{2}[\phi_{R}^{h{\dagger}}S_{x}\phi_{R}^{h}]/[\phi_{R}^{h_{0}{\dagger}}S_{x}\phi_{R}^{h_{0}}] and Rh=th2[ϕLh†SxϕLh]/[ϕRh0†SxϕRh0]R_{h}=t_{h}^{2}[\phi_{L}^{h{\dagger}}S_{x}\phi_{L}^{h}]/[\phi_{R}^{h_{0}{\dagger}}S_{x}\phi_{R}^{h_{0}}] according to the current density j=Ψ†SxΨj=\Psi^{\dagger}S_{x}\Psi of the Weyl-like Hamiltonian. Consequently, conservation of the current requires ∑1/2,1h=s(Rh+Th)=1\sum_{1/2,1}^{h=s}(R_{h}+T_{h})=1. In general, for incident particles with spin-ss Dirac-Weyl fermions and fixed helicity, the transmission show [s+1/2][s+1/2]-fringence.

Role of evanescent waves: In graphene, evanescent waves don’t play a role in the Klein tunneling due to the single-layered cone structure. For multiple-layered cones however, evanescent waves will play an important role in the coupling and transformation of one helicity to another both inside and outside the barrier, by exerting cutoff conditions for each helicity component. We first consider the coupling of the incident helicity to the ones inside the barrier. For a low enough barrier, there are negative helicities inside the barrier which are not coupled; they are evanescent. Specifically, for an incident wave beyond the critical angle θc=arcsin((V0−E)/cℏkm)\theta_{c}=arcsin((V_{0}-E)/c\hbar km) where m=1/2m=1/2 or 11, all helicities are uncoupled, thus there is no transmission. For higher barriers, beyond the critical angle θc=arcsin((V0−E)/cℏkhc)\theta_{c}=arcsin((V_{0}-E)/c\hbar kh_{c}), only helicities of h≤hch\leq h_{c} are coupled in the form of propagating waves. However, the transmission properties would be modified dramatically in this regime. Besides the cutoff condition inside the barrier, the evanescent waves also exert cutoff conditions for different helicities outside the barrier where a small helicity is transformed into a larger one. Since sinϕouth=sinθh/h0sin\phi_{out}^{h}=sin\theta h/h_{0}, for incident wave beyond the critical angle θc=arcsin(h0/h)\theta_{c}=arcsin(h_{0}/h), the transmitted wave with helicity hh become evanescent. This gives a cutoff condition for each helicity component which is larger than the helicity of the incident particle. It is clear that if the incident particle follows the outermost cone of the multicone structure, there will be no cutoff for any helicity outside the barrier.

In Section V we present detailed numerical results of Klein birefringent tunneling by evaluating the different transmission coefficients of spin-3/23/2 Dirac-Weyl fermions with a double cone structure. From the results there, the transmission properties of more complex multilayered cone structure can readily be deduced.

References